In development: shared for comment. Pages appear here once they pass our fact-check. Send feedback

Reform tracker · New Zealand

Physician associates regulated by the Medical Council

Physician associates came under the Medical Council of New Zealand on 1 October 2026. Existing practitioners must apply by 30 November 2026.

The stated rationale

Access to care. The government's Cabinet paper on HPCA reform says "patch protection" makes new professions, like physician associates, "less available and useful".

What changed

Physician associates are now regulated under the HPCA Act by the Medical Council, with two scopes of practice. In the provisional scope, the Council approves each position, primary supervisor and supervision plan. In the general scope, the employer approves supervision by a vocationally registered doctor. In both, supervision must be on site.

Why it matters

New Zealand is regulating the role while the UK tightens its own rules after the Leng review. New Zealand already requires an approved primary supervisor and on-site supervision. Whether it also limits physician associates seeing undifferentiated patients, as the UK’s Leng review recommended, is the question to watch. See the UK tracker.

Who supports it

  • Government
  • NZ Physician Associate Society

Who has raised concerns

  • NZ Resident Doctors' Association (patient safety)

Sources

  1. Cabinet paper: Policy approval for amendments to the HPCA Act
  2. HC Online: New Zealand to recognise physician associates as regulated profession (30 April 2025)
  3. NZ Gazette: Scopes of practice notice
  4. Scoop: Medical Council begins regulating physician associates
  5. NZRDA: Physician associates campaign

Further reading

GOV.UK · 16 Jul 2025

The Leng review: an independent review into physician associate and anaesthesia associate professions

An independent review found the evidence on the roles weak and based on observational data. It made 18 recommendations, including renaming the roles 'physician assistant' and 'physician assistant in anaesthesia', and requiring a named supervising doctor for each physician assistant. The government accepted all of them.

Why it matters: In our view, a template for how a government re-tightens a role after scaling it ahead of the evidence.